At this point, there has been a deluge of financial press about the implications of a “Mortgage Meltdown”, how the Subprime problems started a Credit Crisis, (or Liquidity Crunch, Credibility Crunch, etc), and about speculation into the US Economy’s chances to enter a recession. I don’t think you can turn over a rock anywhere and find anybody who hasn’t ‘heard the news’.
In the Mortgage world, this has made everything a little more challenging. Fewer loan programs exist, fewer borrowers qualify, and fewer deals work. Its an over-reaction to the ‘easy money’ days we saw on the run-up in the housing market. But it will normalize. Just watch…
In the meantime, here are some snippets from articles I’ve recently read. Each is telling, descriptive, or interesting in the context of this changing economy and shifting housing market (my own interjections are beneath each quote where applicable):
- In an era of spread compressuion and search for yield, the rising tide of amle liquidity covered up a profusion of jagged and dangerous rocks. As the tide now goes out, the rocks now get uncovered. The subprime crisis is a classic example of what can be unmasked at low tide. –Stephen Roach, “A Subprime Outlook For The Global Economy“
- As a side note (John here again) This sentiment has already been famously expressed by Warren Buffett as follows: ” It’s only when the tide goes out that you learn who’s been swimming naked”, but it was spoken in relation to an entirely different issue – evidence of history repeating itself yet again…
- Starting in 1991, the US financial sector began contributing more and more to total US corporate profits as our universities began matriculating relatively more financial engineers (modern day alchemists?) compared to mechanical engineers. –Paul Kasriel, Northern Trust
- CDOs, CLOs, SIVs, anybody?
- The central banks have a difficult balance to strike. If policy is too tight, they will be held responsible for creating recessions. If it is too loose, their grip on inflation could slip, as markets and the public cease to believe that prices will remain stable. The great paradox is that the central banks’ mastery of inflation has made the task of keeping financial markets safe all the harder. When people are confident that inflation is low and will remain so, they may be more prepared to take on debt.That leads to an expansion of credit and the pursuit of more exotic rewards by lenders. It feeds price rises in assets such as housing and securities. It encourages excessive risk taking. If so, how can you contain inflation without sparking occasional but dangerous bouts of insanity in asset markets? That is a riddle likely to test central bankers for a long time to come. -The Economist, “Only Human“
- See Hyman Minsky, and “stability breeds instability”
- The Fed is anxious to calm the credit markets, so that the economy’s funds are allocated in line with risk and reward. But even if it succeeds, risky assets are likely to hold much less appeal than they did. The central banker’s task is to unscramble price signals distorted by panic, not to protect the markets from a signal that they do not like. –The Economist “Paper Losses“
- Borrowers found that such creditors, in their hunger for higher yields at a time of low interest rates, were quite willing to drop safeguards altogether, leading to a surge of “covenant-lite” loans. Because banks held on to fewer loans, they relaxed their guard. –The Economist, “Switching off the lites“
- Sounds like a game of Hot Potato
- Providing greater short-term liquidity might ease the taking back of assets on to banks’ balance sheets and hence bring down interbank rates. But it would also undermine the efficient pricing of risk by providing insurance, after the event, for risky behavior. -The Economist, “CSI: Credit Crunch“