Tag: Mortgage Marketplace

Making Sense Of Today’s Market

When speaking with clients lately, it has been made clear to me that the current state of the mortgage marketplace has affected everyone on very different levels. Some people are clearly touched by the panic and have several questions about “what does this mean to me?”, while others seem oblivious that this ‘credit crunch’ thing has anything to do with them now or in the future. More power to them. A panic state – when widespread – is a breeding ground for irrational individual behavior.

The financial talking heads in the media have a few challenges in getting rational information through to the public. For one, many of the faces on the news channels don’t always follow it themselves. But when they surround themselves with economists and analysts who do get it, they need to make sure they speak in parlance that the general public can handle. CDOs, RMBS, ISM, and BBB- are not terms that reside within the daily vocabulary of people with professions outside of the financial arena.

To that concern, here are two articles that offer a broken-down explanation of what is going on right now in the mortgage market, why ‘the subprime meltdown’ affects other areas of borrowing money, the role of the Federal Reserve, etc. You can access them here and here.

Lessons To Be Learned While Countrywide-Hating


Do you remember when we used to party like it was 1999? That was 1999. And then 2000 came, and the stock markets took a digger. A bunch of people lost a bunch of cash, and everyone freaked out about how crazy and dangerous the markets were. Just months earlier, everyone thought they could quit their job to make a fortune day-trading shares of BBQ.com, and other great business latest and greatest IPOs. It was easy while it was easy, and then, the bubble burst.

But what happened after a little time passed? Everyone looked back and said things like “should have seen it coming” and “that was unsustainable growth – had to correct at some point”. And this is always what happens in a market cycle. It booms, it busts, and you want to be there while it’s booming or your neighbor is going to drive a nicer car than you – and we don’t like that. If you are tired of my references to Kindleberger’s Manias Panics & Crashes, skip ahead to the next paragraph. Otherwise, please note that the author walks the reader through the common traits of all history’s asset bubbles, and many of his lessons are being learned – again – by today’s housing market participants. To understand the psychology that drives a market to extremes, he cites a South Sea stock investor in 1720 who said, “When the rest of the world are mad, we must imitate to some measure.”, and he generalizes that “There is nothing so disturbing to one’s well-being and judgment as to see a friend get rich.” No wonder… its in our nature. Monkey see, monkey do. Read it now to put today’s market in context with history – and to give peace with the idea that we have seen it all before, and things will get worked out.

Moving along… one of the typical components a market de-bubbling is the scapegoating. Heads need to roll, somebody needs to take the fall, etc. Its formula. And rightfully, there needs to be an understanding of the players involved in creating the bubble. But don’t join the witch hunt this time, because chances are you had a piece of the action this go around. I am not going to dispute any of the accused in Barry Ritholtz’s list which includes: The Federal Reserve, Borrowers, Mortgage Brokers, Appraisers, Federal Government, Fannie Mae, Lending Banks, Wall Street firms, CDO Managers, Credit Agencies (Moody’s, S&P), Hedge Funds and Institutional Investors. Read his paper for elaboration on each participant.

An interesting article came out on 8/26 in The New York Times specifically flinging mud at one of the mortgage players, “America’s number one lender”, Countrywide. From reading it, it seems some disgruntled ex-employees ran to the press in an effort to expose some of the more eye-popping sales realities of the firm. And if this article is accurate, it would represent a disappointingly low standard of professionalism for an atmosphere where business of a financial nature is to be conducted. But who knows… the media is going to push this kind of sensational stuff to build on the souring momentum of everything connected to this phase of the market.

Keep things in perspective. Stay calm. Great time to read a book.

What Do Fed Rate Actions Do To Mortgage Rates?


Thanks to this chart from HSH, you can see that the answer is “not much”, at least not for mortgages based on long-term rates. The Fed changes the short-term or “overnight” rates to affect the costs of borrowing so that institutions and individuals will be more or less inclined to borrow to fund growth or expenditures. Higher rates means less spending, and the Fed has recently raised rates 17 times to try and slow down our hot economy to a more sustainable pace.

Mortgage rates are determined by the trade value of mortgage backed securities (RMBS), which are bond-type securities whose cashflow is generated by mortgage debt. The liquid value of these bonds reflect longer-term expectations of economic performance, and do not always move with the Fed Funds rate.

Back when the Fed was still raising rates (the incline on the tan line), there was a lot of expectation that this would pressure up the other longer-term rates. But it didn’t, and we wound up with a flat and inverted yield curve. Then we heard an ongoing debate between economists who felt the inverted yield curve indicated the foretelling of a recession, and those who felt that this was a poor predictive tool. Now there are more folks on the recession bandwagon…

A higher Fed Funds rate does affect homeowners with significant home equity lines of credit however. HELOCs are based on the Prime rate, which moves in lock-step with the Fed Funds rate. If you have a sizable HELOC, you’ve probably already noticed your financing get a little top-heavy over the last few years. You will see some relief if the Fed starts to cut rates soon.

So Much For The Soft Landing Theory?


Holy smokes! The market is changing quickly, as the ‘other side’ of the cycle has arrived with a thud. Rates and products in the mortgage market are changing rapidly, and many homeowners are going to get caught up in the crossfire. Last week at American Home Mortgage, 800 Million dollars of would-be loan funds piled up in just 3 days as the company announced that it would not fund deals that had already signed. Forget those in underwriting, application, etc. 800 Million dollars – that’s a lot of homes! Think of the domino effect of broken purchase contracts, failed credit payments, etc. This kind of spiral is what causes the market to buckle, and why a quick change in liquidity is referred to as a “crunch” or “crisis”. Read more about it here, or here, or here.

As for today specifically, Mortgage Bonds are trading higher on unexpected news from Europe connected to US sub-prime mortgage investing problems, as well as Stocks trading lower off the same news. French Bank BNP Paribas, second largest bank in Europe, announced it has temporarily halted withdrawals in three of its mutual funds that have exposure to US subprime credit. As you can imagine, investors like you and I, who are told that their own funds are not available for withdrawal, would be quite worried. In the day’s only economic news, Initial Jobless Claims edged higher by 7,000 claims to 316,000, the highest weekly total since June 30 – a positive factor for the Bond market.

I often talk about the book “Manias, Panics and Crashes“. About a year ago I started reading this book again, and everyone looked at me like I was a doomsayer. But there is so much historical information in this book that can be applied to the current situation. It gives a detailed look at the anatomy of an asset cycle, and when and where systemic breakdown can occur. Rather than stick your head in the sand, take a look at it and consult with a professional about your finances, so that you can be sure you are prepared to weather this storm in housing and the mortgage market. Are you liquid enough to get through this?? It promises to get at least a little uglier before the dust settles. But this correction will be healthy for the long run.

A "Well-Contained" Meltdown

Its always good to keep things in perspective. If you read my last post, it will help to read the text of a recent speech by San Francisco Federal Reserve, President Janet Yellen that was presented on February 21 to the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. She discusses the US Economy ‘glide path’, or what the media likes to refer to as the ‘soft landing’.

She notes that the concern over default rates in the market for sub-prime mortgage backed securities (MBS) appears to be well-contained. Investors have isolated their souring mood to the sub-prime sector, and value of prime MBS are holding well. She suggests that tighter lending standards across the board might not hit with such an impact if the concern remains isolated to sub-prime.

She also discusses the relationship between this marketplace and the housing market, and potential for collapse, saying that “while not fully allayed have diminished”.

It sounds like a very calm response to the news from sub-prime. I hope cool heads prevail while this market shakes itself out.

The Liquidity Crack-Down

Last time we talked about the potential for lender guideline reform to clip off the fringe of the buying pool in real estate, and what the implications for this would be to home values, and the economy in general. In the last few days, I have heard more murmer about lenders trying to tighten up so that they don’t cut their own throats in the secondary market with a reputation for selling bad paper. Colleagues of mine are seeing their entire business model taken out of the product pool. It seems that some would-be buyers are going to have to be left behind here in the cycle, and the real mystery to me is, how big of a ‘fringe’ we are talking about…

Often referred to in the industry as a ‘liar’s loan’, stated income loans are facing serious scrutiny. I won’t get into when and why these loans make sense and are fair and smart, but I can tell you when it looks suspicious. If an applicant has a job that typically pays a flat steady salary, but they want to ‘state’ their income rather than prove it, chances are they don’t really have the income they are stating. “Stating” is for convenience or inability to prove income, not for concealing or misleading. Lenders historically charged higher rates to off-set the risk associated with not proving income, but as these guidelines have become more and more liberal, the ‘stated income’ premium has shrunk. Banks and Wall Street knew that the rising value of real estate served as a safety net against any possible default case, so the risks across the board were smaller. Stated? Who cares, the house is doing 12% a year!

But those times have changed. Underwriters know that some people fudge the numbers, and that some people lie. Wall Street, Congress, and Economists are all growing concerned that too much mortgage debt is floating around qualified on false pretenses. With values flat, or declining, borrowers who have over-stated their reach are feeling the heat. Foreclosure numbers are escalating, investors are getting burned, and congress is calling for tighter standards, more regulation, and less throwing money at people who don’t qualify for it.

This trend is going to persist for a while. Lenders need to shake out their bad products, get back to basic risk management standards, and deliver quality paper to Wall Street. Risky loans can be great tools for borrowers with the apetite for risk and ample knowledge of how to manage that risk. Risky borrowers can still be homeowners with stable and conservative loan products. But when you mix risky borrowers with risky products, and put them in a flat or declining housing market, look out.

A lot of economists have seen this coming for some time. The excess global liquidity has created an environment where risk premiums have been condensed so far that nobody can evaluate risk adequately any more. Bill Gross talked about this almost a year ago, noting that junk bonds were getting A Paper prices, and concluding that investors were not being fairly compensated for the risk they were taking. In most cases, it was probably not clear how much risk there was. John Mauldin expects this to turn into a full blown scandal in the mortgage debt marketplace, as those who have been buying the subprime debt are paying A Paper prices for BBB- Paper, and have been possibly mislead by creative derivitave products.

Its complicated stuff. Markets ebb and flow. Sometimes the waves get big, and cause a little damage when they smack up against the shore. The longer it takes to correct these problems, the harder the correction hits, and the more it hurts. Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve have been working to clip liquidity to the tune of 17 0.25% rate hikes. The Bank of Japan recently came up to 0.50% from a long-time low of 0.00%. This makes it more expensive for banks to lend money, and for people to borrow.

This has helped cool the housing market, but people who shouldn’t be borrowing still are. Risky borrowers can still get risky loans, and they have been injecting instability into the system. Now we are going to see institutions step in and self-regulate. And we are going to see congress step in and regulate with red tape. I expect to see the 100% purchase scenario in housing become very difficult relative to the current ease. Stated Income documentation will become difficult for W-2 employees. Down payment, income and credit standards are going to inch up.

If this hits with too big of a thud, there goes the ‘soft landing’. Angelo Mozillo said he has never seen a soft landing, and you have to be careful when anybody tells you “this time it’s different”. Let’s hope this all shakes out without a lot of turbulence.

Anatomy Of A Bubble

I’m not convinced that we have seen the bottom in housing. I’m not convinced that we have seen a successful soft landing either. Things definitely slowed down going into the end of 2006, and they are definitely picking up again in early 2007. But I don’t see any reason to believe we will return to the hyperbolic growth we saw in previous years – or anything close to it. In fact, there still is some very real concern that we could see a more significant drop in house values.

The Federal Reserve is expected to keep rates flat all year. Some economists think we will see a rate cut late in the year, and some see a rate hike a possibility still. History tells us that the Fed usually starts cutting rates within 9-18 months of their last rate hike.

I have often said that with so many variables in the economy, and in the housing market specifically, all it can take is one environmental change to trigger a shift in consumer mentality, and thus consumer behavior. One of these variables that has re-entered the fold in the last few weeks is Wall Streets control over mortgage lending practices. With sub-prime lenders going out of business, Wall St. has raised concern with sub-prime mortgage backed securities. The lenders are responding by tightening their lending guidelines to uphold or improve their credit ratings.

A year ago, congress was advising the lending industry to do this, but lenders were actually relaxing guidelines in an effort to grab more of the shrinking volume of business. So with this pendulum swinging back the other way, you can expect the fringe of buyer access to be trimmed away, thereby reducing the pool of potential buyers, demand, housing liquidity, and ultimately prices. If lenders go too far too fast, either by their own proactive measures, or in response to Wall St. demand, we could see a shock to this system. And if the consumer perceives this to be significant, thats when the potential to freeze up and panic sets in.

Weakening prices slow what Paul Kasriel of Northern Trust refers to as ‘household deficit spending’, as homeowners cannot spend their home equity on other consumer purchases. If you don’t think this is a big deal, take note of the fact that the US Savings rate is at its lowest since the GREAT DEPRESSION, at a negative 0.5%. People are using their homes like ATM’s on a National level. Cutting off access to this slows spending, and the economy in general. Enough of this and the Fed is back into rate-cutting territory.

So while I hear agents advising their clients that “the bubble has not burst“, and that offers without contingency and 10% above the asking price are required “if you really want this home”, I don’t like anybody being too anxious to lead with logic when transacting in real estate. It is competitive right now, yes. But I’d be concerned that the housing market is making a head-fake here.

When does an Alternative Mortgage Make Sense?

The recent rise in short term interest rates has brought financial strain to misguided and mismanaged mortgage consumers. The media has of course spotlighted this issue and used it to fuel the negative sentiment toward and resentment of Mortgage Brokers. Don’t get me wrong – those who know me well already know I agree with much of the critique of my own industry – but I also think the media likes to make examples in extreme cases.

The case for the traditional 30 year fixed (FRM) has always been safety from interest rate risk exposure. In other words, lock in now for 30 years, and you never have to worry if rates go up. You can refinance if rates go down. But even Alan Greenspan thinks this strategy can be wasteful for some consumers. What if you know you will move in a shorter period of time? Or at least think the odds are good? How about if you expect major changes to your income in the next few years? Have near-term financial goals outside of the home, like funding a college education or retirement plan? Statistics tell us that getting to the mid-way point in a 30 year mortgage is highly unlikely. Average loan duration is around 5.1 years.

Mortgage Planning explores alternative types of mortgage financing so that you can adjust the structure of your largest liability to make room for other goals. This may mean lower payments now, and higher payments later. It may mean less certainty in the future, or greater interest rate risk. It may also mean the difference between living ‘house-poor’ and achieving more of your financial goals. When weighing these risks, you need to also explore the probability that they would even matter. And what do you risk by being too safe?

For a more sterile example of why alternative mortgage products might make sense, see this short essay by the San Francisco Federal Reserve, especially the section titled: “Some motives for choosing alternative mortgages”.

Everybody is different. Make sure you have proper guidance so you can fit your mortgage plan within your financial plan – and your life plan.

In Defense of The Option ARM


Business Week recently published a scathing article about Adjustable-Rate Pay-Option Mortgages (aka The Option ARM) that has sent a pretty good ripple through the lending community. Well, big surprise, this one-sided eye-grabbing piece is typical of the flesh-eating virus style of media-induced panic.

Before I defend this loan product outright, I want to be clear on something: there is no doubt in my mind that this is an often-abused and often-misunderstood product. But I do feel the need to point out a few problems with the article, and and present another side to these loans. Read the article here.

The key benefit for Option ARMs is the payment flexibility, where a borrower is allowed to make minimal monthly payments on their home loan. It is a strictly cash-flow driven financial tool, and generally is not the cheapest type of loan available. As is with any other time value of money concept, you are paying a premium for this flexibility. This may be in the form of higher interest cost, higher risk of increasing interest, or in the current rate environment, both.

Business Week makes a fair claim that many mortgage brokers are pushing this product for inappropriate borrower scenarios, and this is a real problem that I agree with. The simplified sequence looks a little like this:

Home owners are attracted by the low minimum payments – commonly featured in mortgage broker’s radio and print advertisements – and do not ultimately understand how the loan works before they sign up. They make minimum payments for a while, and then get caught by surprise when they realize that (A) their loan is growing in size and (B) their payments minimums are adjusting to keep pace with this increasing balance. Add to the mix a realization of a slowing appreciation rate for US real estate, and the stage is set a full-blown panic. All the media needs to do to sell a few magazines is run headlines like “Nightmare Mortgages”.

Throughout this article, BW gives examples of some people who are feeling the pinch of rising rates and payments on their Option-ARM. She presents that they have been screwed by their mortgage broker, and that the mortgage broker has been led along like a puppy by banks to sell these products by offering high margin revenues for the product. Its the man stickin’ it to the people yet again, and the result is a shaky American financial infastructure, ready to buckle beneath its own weight when Mr. & Mrs. Average Homeowner come up short on their upwardly adjusting mortgage payments.

Let’s not forget how the media makes a living. Do I have to make the case that they have a history of blowing things out of proportion? Is it obvious already that they sell more magazines, more commercial time, more web impressions when they have really dramatic news to talk about? A recent James Bond movie made fun of a corrupt media mogul who was creating global conflict to sell newspapers. Its a parody, but it comes from the every day media machine.

And they are blowing things out of proportion here…

First, no responsibility is put on the borrower, the consumer, the buyer to educate themselves. The American consumer is presented as a feather in the wind, succeptable to any mortgage broker’s lousy self-serving advice. I don’t buy it. The consumer controls the mortgage process more today than ever, educated (albeit in a commonly misleading way) to a dangerous degree. They think they know it all, but they dont know enough. They surf the web for info, and think they can walk into the transaction telling the mortgage broker what is best for them in the mortgage universe, and how much it should cost. What choice does a mortgage broker have but to tell them what they want to hear, that the lowest payment out there is based on a 1% Option ARM start rate?

Well, that is your common mortgage broker for you. So who can blame the consumer for making every attempt to arm themselves with the latest info, and come in to the transaction with their defenses in place? The consumer fears the mortgage broker, and the mortgage broker fears the consumer. This is a recipe for a bad deal. From my perspective, this is the ‘Nightmare Mortgage’. All this drama about Option ARMs is just a symptom of that problem.

In most of the case studies, there is no mention of the situation prior to the Option ARM. Most of these people are in over their heads already. Harold can’t afford any mortgage product on the income quoted. The Shaw’s dont have enough income to qualify for their mortgage, etc. Did the Option ARM really get them in trouble, or are were they already headed there? Maybe they mismanaged their finances, or just had some tough turns in life. It happens.

But lets not let these folks get away with blaming everything on the bank or the broker. While I do agree with some abuse from inside the business, is the consumer not required to take responsibility of their own situation? Not reading the terms? Not taking the care to find a reputable broker? I mean, I can go into WalMart and buy a shotgun, but if I shoot somebody with it, I am not allowed to blame it to the blue-vested clerk who rang the register…

These loans are promoted with 1%-2% pay rates as the hook. Does it not seem too good to be true? It is! Theres more to this story – a lot more! I hear radio ads for these, and I get the flyers in the mail. Most of the advertisements seem criminal to me. And I do think that a large segment of this industry is participating in a misleading game, and delivering a back-handed slap to people in a time-sensitive, major financial transaction – often leaving them with little choice or time to react once they realize the bigger picture.

To date I have talked more people out of the Option-ARM than I have put into the Option-ARM. But we still put them together for the right situations.

In todays marketplace for real estate finance, there are countless options. There are so many products that can be tweaked to fit a loan scenario, where you can emphasize one goal over another – financial, personal, etc (related to taxes, investments, inherritance, divorce, retirement, education, timing… the list can go on and on…). The Option ARM represents one of the most sophisticated tools available, but you need to know when and why it is right for you. A Certified Mortgage Planner isn’t likely to lead you astray; make sure you are working with somebody who can educate you, and plan with you to weave the mortgage product with your greater financial goals.

Work with an expert. Get a referral from somebody you trust. And then let them work with you to provide a mortgage plan. Only you know your financial habits and objectives. And I guarantee you that a good mortgage planner knows a lot more about their business landscape than you do. If you can’t put trust in them to help you navigate real estate finance decisions, then its not the right person to work with.