How HARP Phase II (aka HARP 2.0) Will Help

The revamped HARP program was announced on Monday as expected. Some of the expected changes from the original HARP program were met, others were not.

The new key features include:

  • No maximum Loan To Value. Theoretically, you could owe 400k on a property valued at 40k and you could be eligible.
  • Elimination of Reps and Warranties which lowers risks for participating lenders
Features that don’t help:
  • Lower adverse pricing adjustments for shorter term loans – incentive to refinance into a 15 year term
  • Loan must date back to May 2009 or earlier, HARP remains a one-time use program
Some of the reasons why HARP failed to live up to expectations are being addressed here. LTV was a big one. Even though the program allowed LTV up to 125%, loans above 105% were scarcely provided by lenders. Quite often, it required the “same servicing lender” to originate the HARP loan, which was a problem when a majority of servicing lenders had quit originating loans entirely in the wake of the Mortgage Meltdown.

The Reps and Warranties issue should also help lenders jump in to participate in this program. Program guidelines can be laid out with the government’s design, but that doesn’t force (theoretically) free market participants (banks) to participate. They’ll do it if they believe they can make money with it.

Estimates are floating around that speculate anywhere from 1.9 Million to 3.9 Million homeowners could benefit from HARP II. It will help.

Lender program details will begin to emerge in mid-November. In the meantime, the majority of homeowners are unaware of whether they have Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans; do the research now.

Make sure you enter the information exactly as it reads on your mortgage statement. The forms are sensitive to “St.” vs “Street” etc. If your loan is backed by either one, make note of it. If you’d like me to contact you when more details emerge, fill in a few details in the form below.

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    Can I Refinance my Mortgage if I’m Underwater and I’ve Never been Late on a Payment?

    These days, no single question comes up more frequently than this. An “underwater” home is one where the outstanding mortgage debt exceeds the appraised value of the real estate. Being underwater is a common situation 4 years into the mortgage meltdown. On average, the cities of Las Vegas and Orlando are underwater.

    An announcement is expected today about a revamped refinancing plan that would open mortgage refinancing access to an estimated 3 to 4 million underwater homeowners.

    As the Great Recession wages on, rates have hit historical lows. But the refinance party has been an exclusive one; a huge segment of American homeowners are unqualified to re-borrow the debt they already have because of the loss in value of their homes – even when doing so would bring tremendous savings, thus putting them in a safer, more affordable situation. It’s quite a common trap.

    There have several stimulus package programs aimed at helping struggling homeowners over the past 4 years. Too many to keep track of. Actually, I take that back. At Propublica, they have been keeping track of not only the various programs, but also the impact each has had. This list is all Obama-era, and lest you think I’m subtly criticizing the our fearless leader here, there were failed efforts under Bush as well, such as: Hope For Homeowners.

    Home Affordable Refinance Plan 2.0?

    Of all the plans enacted thus far, Home Affordable Refinance Plan (HARP) has been the most impactful. The HARP program reached in to the underwater sector making any borrower who has a Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae insured loan eligible up to 125% of their home’s value.

    In their model, underwater homeowners could benefit from a program that opens access to refinancing for borrowers who are current on their mortgages, but unable to access current rates due to equity or income qualification hurdles.

    HARP was estimated to open up refinancing options for 3 to 4 million homeowners. Since it emerged in early 2009, a little more than 800k people have successfully refinanced under HARP. The plan has largely been considered a disappointment, but it has penetrated the distressed homeowner market further than any other plan. In recent weeks, speculation has been building about a renewed effort with HARP that would address some of the reasons why it has not been more effective.

    Likely HARP Plan Tweaks

    recent study from the Congressional Budget Office speculated about the costs and benefits of revising HARP. The revamped plan is expected to carry some or all of the following adjustments:

    • remove the Loan-to-Value caps (presently at 125%)
    • reduce if not remove the loan pricing adjustments that currently make high LTV HARP loans carry a substantial rate premium relative to the broader market
    • soften or eliminate income underwriting guidelines
    • eliminate appraisals
    • allow repeat HARP transactions, as opposed to one-time access
    The basis for eligibility gets reduced to:
    • Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae insured loan
    • Current on payments
    At this point, if you’re deep underwater, and still making the payments, have you not essentially made the case that A) you have the ability to pay your mortgage and B) you are willing to pay your mortgage?

    The tenets of mortgage underwriting are all based on evaluating willingness and ability to repay the debt. How much more simple could it be? Plus, if underwarter homeowners were able to access rates in the low 4% range, it stands to reason they’d be much less inclined to let go of that home. When you’re stuck at 6.5% or you have a rate that is adjusting and you fear the future increases, then you have the makings of a strategic defaulter.

    Allowing refinancing based on payment history is an extreme concept in this underwriting environment, but it is a back door solution to address a massive amount of negative momentum that continues to poison the housing market.  If it works.

    There are still several reasons why it may continue to be a headline that sounds a lot better than the story itself. This plan will be full of criticism, critique, and cries. There are unintended side-effects in the making. The philosophical debate between proponents of free markets and of government intervention will be full of sparks. And with an election season approaching, the political pandering and soapbox superhero nonsense will be enough to make my skin crawl.

    But, if this program unlocks refinancing for the millions of homeowners who have been boxed out of the market for the past few years, there will be widespread stimulus in the form of $100, $200, $300, even $500 per month in savings. It will be well worth paying attention to.

    What do I do Next?

    I can help you find out if your loan is backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Contact me if you’d like me to check into it for you, and to help you figure out if the new HARP program will be able to help.

     

      Your Name (required)

      Your Email (required)

      Subject

      Your Message


       

      Is This Helping?

      Just thinkin
      Just thinking out loud...

      A recent survey conducted at Zillow has provided some eye-popping insights into the consumer’s mortgage brain trust. In short, they are wildly un-slash-mis-informed about mortgages.

      Blame The System, Not The Consumer

      It’s a full time job for me to understand this business, the marketplace, the regulatory elements, and the general process of navigating a home financing transaction. It’s nothing short of complicated. And to be fair, it’s rather boring unless you’re at that point in life where you need to go through the process – one that happens a handful of times at best in our lives (even then, to call it an enticing area of study would be a sham…). So there’s not a lot of incentive to stay “fresh”.

      I certainly cannot blame the consumer for being lost.

      However, some of the misunderstandings are notable. Most of my clients appreciate the time I take to sit down and educate them about the process so that they can make well-informed decisions. It’s not what everyone I work with wants, but my objective is to be as available to them as desired in this capacity. So these misunderstandings are notable, to me, as one who educates others about the process.

      Sometimes I get too complex, too deep, or grind over details that are not ultimately of concern to my clients. I’ve seen their eyelids get kind of heavy on a few occasions. But I’d rather be at fault for over-explaining than under-explaining something.

      Why I Do This

      This survey reminds me not to gloss over even the most basic of concepts on the assumption that they’re already understood. Much of this site’s mission is about sharing information and helping to educate the consumer when in need of guidance. Sometimes I’m here just to blow off a little steam. From the basic mechanics of mortgage borrowing to the subjective and contextual  facets of the journey each individual consumer embarks upon when exploring the idea of borrowing money, everyone is in search of slightly different information. I hope to have a little something for everyone.

      What brought you here? Are you finding what you’re looking for?

      Why Is The Interest Rate On My Purchase Agreement Different Than What My Lender Said?

      This is a question we hear all the time.

      The sequence of events leading up to buying a home includes the following:

      • pre-approval & custom rate quote
      • present offer to buy a property
      • acceptance of offer & eventual rate lock

      The first and last of these steps are handled by the lender, and the second one by the real estate agent.  A buyer will often get mixed signals  from these first two steps, because both include a snapshot of the mortgage rate prior to the point where it gets locked in.

      But there is a key difference between the two snapshots. The rate indicated in the contract is deliberately high. In most contracts/purchase agreements, there is a section indicating a ceiling rate at which the buyer will obtain financing for their loan. And if the best market rate they can get is above this rate, it means the buyer has the option to cancel the contract. There’s always a chance that a buyer could make an offer, and by the time it gets accepted, see rates run up beyond a level that they can afford, so using this maximum rate as a ceiling limits the buyer’s exposure to the interest rate market.

      Reading between the lines, sellers might look at a lower ceiling rate as a higher risk. In other words, “this buyer is only willing to buy if they can finance at X.XXX% or less”. From that perspective, the higher the rate, the safer the seller, and the stronger your offer. The real estate agent knows to pad the actual market rate by a little just so they do not portray the buyer as skittish.

      The cost of financing is as significant as the cost of the house in the long run. So having a ceiling rate here is a safety valve to protect the buyer.

      The rate indicated in the contract is not a mortgage quote. A rate that is above the current market rate tells the seller you are eager to buy their home. A rate at or below tells them you want to have an easy out. You’ll want to find the right balance when presenting an offer that is appealing to the seller, and safe for the buyer.

      When it comes to getting at the actual interest rate for your loan, work with your lender to devise a locking strategy. And keep in mind, rates are changing frequently.